Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-05-30 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.40 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Caramel Latte and Scarlet Wave | Black, Blue and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 SM6450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 600 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 is a little bit better than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024), getting an 81.6 score against 75.2. Google Pixel 2's design is just a little bit thinner and a lot lighter than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024), even though it was released many years before. The Google Pixel 2 has a way better processing power than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024), although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
Google Pixel 2 has a brighter display than Moto G Stylus 5G (2024), because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels and a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a bit more pixels per inch of screen. Google Pixel 2 captures just a bit better pictures and videos than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024), although it has a back camera with lot less mega pixels, they both have a same size aperture.
Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) counts with a way bigger storage for games and applications than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) also has a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 2 TB. The Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) has a much longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.