Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 14 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-05-30 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.40 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Caramel Latte and Scarlet Wave | Aurora black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 SM6450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 600 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.14 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ has a global score of 83.7, which is better than the Moto G Stylus 5G (2024)'s 75.2 general score. Both devices we are comparing here use Android operating system, but the LG V50 ThinQ has the previous 10 version while Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) has Android 14. LG V50 ThinQ's body has the same thickness than Moto G Stylus 5G (2024), but it's just a little bit lighter.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with a much better performance than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024), although it has less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. LG V50 ThinQ has a more vivid display than Moto G Stylus 5G (2024), because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 3120 resolution and a higher quantity of pixels per inch in the display.
The LG V50 ThinQ captures just a bit better pictures and videos than Moto G Stylus 5G (2024), because although it has a way less MP resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a larger camera aperture to capture better low light photography and video. The Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) has a bit more storage for applications and games than LG V50 ThinQ, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) also has an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 2 TB.
Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) counts with greater battery duration than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.