Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-05-30 | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.40 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Caramel Latte and Scarlet Wave | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 SM6450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 600 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.14 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G is much better than Moto G Stylus 5G (2024), with a 91.8 score against 75.2. The Galaxy A71 5G body is just a little lighter and a little bit thinner than Moto G Stylus 5G (2024), even though it was released many years before. These devices come with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A71 5G has the previous 11 version while Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) has Android 14 version.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G counts with a much powerful CPU than Moto G Stylus 5G (2024), although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G counts with a little bit better display than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024). They have an equal 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, a screen with the same size and a higher amount of pixels per inch in the screen.
The Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) counts with a quite bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) also has a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 2 TB.
Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) has just a bit better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G captures a lot better videos and photos than Moto G Stylus 5G (2024), and although they both have a same size aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G also has a much more mega-pixels back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.