Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-05-30 | 2018-08-24 |
| 6.40 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 7.09 ounces |
| Caramel Latte and Scarlet Wave | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 514 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 SM6450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 600 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note9 is better than the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024), with an 87.1 score against 75.2. The Galaxy Note9 is a much older, just a little heavier and a bit thicker phone than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024). Galaxy Note9 features a very superior processing unit than Moto G Stylus 5G (2024), although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Galaxy Note9 features a brighter display than Moto G Stylus 5G (2024), because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch of display and a higher 1440 x 2960px resolution. The Galaxy Note9 captures slightly better pictures and videos than Moto G Stylus 5G (2024), because although it has a back-facing camera with a lot worse resolution, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light captures.
The Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) counts with much more storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note9, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory, the Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) also has an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 2 TB. The Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) has better battery performance than Galaxy Note9, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.