Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 15 | -- |
| 2025-04-08 | 2017-10-19 |
| -- | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| PANTONE Gibraltar Sea and PANTONE Surf the Web | Black, Blue and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5 inches |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| -- | 441 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 SM6475-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 600 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 is much better than Moto G Stylus 5G (2025), with an 81.6 score against 71.9. Google Pixel 2 features an extremely better CPU than Moto G Stylus 5G (2025), although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores. Google Pixel 2 has a much better looking display than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025), although it has a much smaller screen.
Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) counts with a much greater memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory, the Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) also has a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 2 TB. The Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) counts with a way better camera than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates, a same size aperture and the same video resolution, the Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) also has a lot larger back-facing camera sensor which offers a lot better photo and video quality and a back-facing camera with much more MP.
Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) has a really longer battery performance than Google Pixel 2, because it has an 85% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.