Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 82.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2025-04-08 | 2019-06-20 |
| -- | 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| PANTONE Gibraltar Sea and PANTONE Surf the Web | Cocktail Orange, Daybreak Black and Seawater Blue |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| -- | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 409 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 SM6475-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SDM675 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 600 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.88 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A60 is better than Moto G Stylus 5G (2025), having an 82.3 score against 71.9. Both phones in this review have Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy A60 has the older 11 version while Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) has Android 15 version. The Galaxy A60 features a much faster processing unit than Moto G Stylus 5G (2025), although it has less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Samsung Galaxy A60 counts with a way better looking screen than Moto G Stylus 5G (2025), although it has a bit smaller screen. The Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) counts with a way better camera than Galaxy A60, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for capturing pictures and/or video in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) also counts with a lot higher 50 megapixels resolution camera and a much larger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) counts with a superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A60, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) also has an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 2 TB.
The Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) counts with a really longer battery life than Galaxy A60, because it has a 47% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.