Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2025-04-08 | 2020-06-19 |
| -- | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| PANTONE Gibraltar Sea and PANTONE Surf the Web | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| -- | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| -- | 393 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 SM6475-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 600 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.14 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is a lot better than the Moto G Stylus 5G (2025), having a 91.8 score against 71.9. These phones use Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has the previous 11 version while Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) has Android 15. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G counts with a much better performing processor than Moto G Stylus 5G (2025), although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Galaxy A71 5G features a way better display than Moto G Stylus 5G (2025). They have a display of the same size. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G features just a bit better camera than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025), because although it has a smaller sensor capturing lower quality images, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates, the same (4K) video resolution and a same size diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G also counts with a way better resolution back camera.
The Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) features a bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) also has a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 2 TB. Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) counts with just a little better battery life than Galaxy A71 5G, because it has an 11% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.