Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2025-04-08 | 2017-02-24 |
| -- | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| PANTONE Gibraltar Sea and PANTONE Surf the Web | Black and Gold |
| -- | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 367 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 SM6475-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 600 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.14 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.88 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy C9 Pro is much better than Moto G Stylus 5G (2025), getting a score of 81 against 71.9. These devices work with Android OS, but the Galaxy C9 Pro has 6.0 Marshmallow version and Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) has Android 15 version. Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro counts with a really superior performance than Moto G Stylus 5G (2025), although it has less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
Galaxy C9 Pro counts with a much sharper display than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025), although it has a quite smaller display. Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) counts with a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a much better 3840x2160 video quality, a back camera with a way better 50 megapixels resolution and a bigger camera aperture for better low light images.
Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) features a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has an external memory card slot that admits up to 2 TB and 128 GB internal storage. The Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) has greater battery life than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.