Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Vivo |
| Android 15 | Android 14 |
| 2025-04-08 | 2024-04-03 |
| -- | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| PANTONE Gibraltar Sea and PANTONE Surf the Web | Black and White |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 8 inches |
| -- | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| -- | 414 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 SM6475-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 600 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 6.21 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.14 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has an overall score of 77.8, which is a little bit better than the Moto G Stylus 5G (2025)'s general score of 71.9. Both of these phones come with Android OS, but vivo X Fold 3 Pro has the previous 14 version while Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) has Android 15 version. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a little faster processing unit than Moto G Stylus 5G (2025), and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a way better display than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025), because it has a brighter screen and a bigger display. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a slightly bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Moto G Stylus 5G (2025), because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 384 GB more internal storage capacity.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro captures a bit better videos and photos than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025), and although they both have a 50 MP back camera, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a bigger camera aperture for better low light photos and video, a bigger camera sensor providing a better image quality and a much better 7680x4320 video resolution.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a bit better battery lifetime than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025), because it has a 5700mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.