Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-16 | 2018-10-26 |
| 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Mystic indigo | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 397 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
IPhone XR is slightly better than the Moto G Stylus, getting a score of 82 against 79.7. IPhone XR's body is a bit thinner than Moto G Stylus, but it's just a little heavier and was released just 18 months before. The Apple iPhone XR has a quite superior performance than Moto G Stylus, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a 64-bit CPU.
IPhone XR features a bit sharper screen than Moto G Stylus, although it has a quite worse display pixels density, a way lower resolution of 828 x 1792 and a bit smaller screen. Moto G Stylus takes much better photographs and videos than iPhone XR, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Moto G Stylus also counts with a lot larger sensor which provides a lot higher photo and video quality, a back camera with a much better resolution and a larger camera aperture.
The Motorola Moto G Stylus has a much greater memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than iPhone XR, because it has an external memory card slot that admits up to 512 GB and more internal storage capacity. The Motorola Moto G Stylus features longer battery performance than iPhone XR, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Apple iPhone XR is a better device, it costs a lot more than Moto G Stylus, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Moto G Stylus. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy the Apple iPhone XR, otherwise you can save some money and get the Moto G Stylus, resigning a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.