Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-16 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Mystic indigo | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone XS is a bit better than the Moto G Stylus, with a score of 84.2 against 79.7. Apple iPhone XS is an older phone than the Moto G Stylus, but it's somewhat thinner and a little bit lighter anyway. The iPhone XS has a faster processing unit than Moto G Stylus, because although it has a lower number of cores , and they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the iPhone XS also counts with a 64-bit processing unit.
Apple iPhone XS has a sharper display than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little bit better quantity of pixels per inch of screen and a slightly better resolution of 1125 x 2436px. The Motorola Moto G Stylus captures better videos and photos than iPhone XS, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Motorola Moto G Stylus also counts with a way bigger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a bigger diafragm aperture for better low light photos and videos and a camera with a way better 48 mega-pixels resolution.
The Moto G Stylus has a lot bigger storage to install applications and games than iPhone XS, because it has 64 GB more internal storage and an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The Motorola Moto G Stylus has a very superior battery duration than iPhone XS, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 2659mAh.
Although iPhone XS is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Moto G Stylus, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Moto G Stylus. If you want to save some dollars, you can buy Moto G Stylus, giving up a couple features and specs, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.