Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 5.1, 5.0 |
| 2020-04-16 | 2014-10-15 |
| 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.27 x 3.27 x 0.40 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Mystic indigo | Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | $ 1019.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 490 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3220mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 330 hours standby time 24 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Nexus 6 has an overall score of 81.1, which is a bit better than the Moto G Stylus's 79.7 global score. Despite of the fact the Google Nexus 6 is a lot older and thicker than Moto G Stylus, it's construction is still just a little lighter. These phones include Android OS (operating system), but Google Nexus 6 has 5.1 version while Moto G Stylus has Android 11.
Google Nexus 6 has a little faster processing unit than Moto G Stylus, because although it has a lower number of cores and a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with an extra graphics processor. The Google Nexus 6 has a much better screen than Moto G Stylus, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution and a bit greater pixels count in each inch in the display.
Moto G Stylus features a lot better camera than Google Nexus 6, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same video definition, the Moto G Stylus also has a larger aperture and a camera in the back with a way better resolution. The Motorola Moto G Stylus features a much greater memory capacity to store more apps and games than Google Nexus 6, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
Moto G Stylus counts with better battery life than Google Nexus 6, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3220mAh.
Although Google Nexus 6 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Moto G Stylus, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Moto G Stylus. If you are trying to save some money, you can get the Moto G Stylus, letting go a couple features, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.