Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-16 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Mystic indigo | Black, Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel is a bit better than Moto G Stylus, having a general score of 80.2 against 79.7. The Google Pixel is an incredibly older phone than the Moto G Stylus, but it's noticeably lighter and just a little thinner anyway. The Moto G Stylus features a little better processing power than Google Pixel, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM, the Moto G Stylus also has a higher number of cores (but slower).
The Google Pixel has a bit more vivid display than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because although it has a really smaller display and a bit lower 1080 x 1920 resolution, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per display inch. The Moto G Stylus counts with a better camera than Google Pixel, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Moto G Stylus also has a back camera with a lot better resolution, a larger back camera sensor taking higher quality videos and photographs and a larger aperture.
Motorola Moto G Stylus features a much greater memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Motorola Moto G Stylus also has an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Moto G Stylus features a much longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, Google Pixel is also the cheapest one, which makes it an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.