Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-16 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Mystic indigo | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 XL has a general score of 80.7, which is a bit better than Moto G Stylus's general score of 79.7. The Google Pixel 3 XL is an older phone than Moto G Stylus, but it is somewhat thinner and just a bit lighter anyway. The Google Pixel 3 XL has a bit better looking display than Moto G Stylus, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2960 pixels resolution and a greater display pixels density.
Google Pixel 3 XL counts with a bit better processing power than Motorola Moto G Stylus. Both have 4 GB of RAM and a Octa-Core processor. The Motorola Moto G Stylus features a much bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has a SD extension slot that holds up to 512 GB and more internal memory.
The Moto G Stylus captures better photos and videos than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video definition, the Moto G Stylus also has a way more MP back camera, a lot larger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a bigger aperture for better low-light images and video.
The Motorola Moto G Stylus counts with a little better battery duration than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the Google Pixel 3 XL is also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.