Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-04-16 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Mystic indigo | Black, Purple and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto G Stylus has a score of 79.7, which is just a bit better than the Google Pixel 3a's 78.8 score. Both of these phones work with the same Android 11 operating system. Motorola Moto G Stylus's construction is newer, but thicker and much heavier than the Google Pixel 3a. Google Pixel 3a features just a bit better display than Moto G Stylus, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2220px, it also counts with a bit more pixels per display inch.
Google Pixel 3a's CPU is just as good as Moto G Stylus's processing unit, both of them have 8 cores and 4 GB of RAM memory. The Motorola Moto G Stylus captures much better videos and photos than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Motorola Moto G Stylus also has a way larger sensor shooting way higher quality videos and photos, a camera in the back with a much better resolution and a bigger aperture.
Moto G Stylus features a much better storage capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 512 GB and more internal storage capacity. The Motorola Moto G Stylus features longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Although Moto G Stylus is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Google Pixel 3a, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Google Pixel 3a. If you want to save some dollars, you can buy the Google Pixel 3a, giving up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.