Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-04-16 | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Mystic indigo | Clearly white and Just black |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a 5G is a little bit better than the Moto G Stylus, getting an 87.5 score against 79.7. Even though the Google Pixel 4a 5G and the Moto G Stylus were only released 7 months apart, the Google Pixel 4a 5G is thinner and somewhat lighter. Both devices we compare here come with the same Android 11 operating system, so you shouldn't notice any difference in that aspect.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a bit more powerful processor than Moto G Stylus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has a higher amount of RAM. Google Pixel 4a 5G has just a bit better looking display than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit better display pixels density and a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340.
The Motorola Moto G Stylus counts with a lot bigger memory for games and applications than Google Pixel 4a 5G, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Motorola Moto G Stylus also has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 512 GB. The Moto G Stylus has a much better camera than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has slower video frame rates, and they both have a F1.7 diafragm aperture and the same video quality, the Moto G Stylus also counts with a lot more MP back-facing camera and a lot larger back camera sensor capturing much higher quality videos and pictures.
The Moto G Stylus features a little longer battery duration than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a 3% more battery size.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G is a lot more expensive than Moto G Stylus, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.