Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | HTC |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-16 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Mystic indigo | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 5 |
| 397 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto G Stylus has a score of 79.7, which is slightly better than the HTC U Ultra's 77 score. The Motorola Moto G Stylus construction is much newer, but somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker than the HTC U Ultra. The HTC U Ultra has a bit better screen than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560px resolution and a better count of pixels per inch in the screen.
The HTC U Ultra features a slightly better memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB. Motorola Moto G Stylus features a bit better CPU than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM, the Motorola Moto G Stylus also has a larger number of cores.
The Motorola Moto G Stylus features greater battery duration than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh. Motorola Moto G Stylus shoots much clearer photographs and videos than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same video frame rates, the Motorola Moto G Stylus also has a larger camera aperture to capture better photography in low light situations, a lot more MP back facing camera and a larger camera sensor taking higher quality photos and videos.
The Motorola Moto G Stylus is not only the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest, which makes this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.