Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-04-16 | 2016-03-31 |
| 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.88 x 2.91 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.61 ounces |
| Mystic indigo | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Metal |
| $ 300.00 | $ 499.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.3 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 397 pixels per inch | 554 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 8996 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2800mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto G Stylus is a bit better than LG G5, with a overall score of 79.7 against 76.1. The Moto G Stylus construction is way newer than LG G5's, although it's heavier and thicker. Both of these phones have Android OS, but Moto G Stylus has an older 11 version while LG G5 has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
LG G5 features a bit better display than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a better amount of pixels per inch of screen. Moto G Stylus has just a bit better performance than LG G5, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM, the Moto G Stylus also has more cpu cores (although they are slower).
The Moto G Stylus features a much better camera than LG G5, and although they both have the same video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Moto G Stylus also has a larger camera aperture, a way bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a back facing camera with lot more MP.
Motorola Moto G Stylus has a quite bigger memory to install applications and games than LG G5, because although it has an external SD slot that allows up to 512 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. Motorola Moto G Stylus features a way better battery duration than LG G5, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Motorola Moto G Stylus not only is the best devices of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.