Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-04-16 | 2018-11-09 |
| 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Mystic indigo | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 397 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto G Stylus has a global score of 79.7, which is a bit better than LG G7 Fit's 77 overall score. Both phones in our current comparison have Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola Moto G Stylus has an older 11 version while LG G7 Fit has Android 8.1 Oreo version. Even though Motorola Moto G Stylus is newer than the LG G7 Fit, it's somewhat heavier and thicker.
Moto G Stylus features a bit more powerful CPU than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM, the Moto G Stylus also has a larger number of cores. The LG G7 Fit counts with an incredibly better looking display than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a greater display pixel density and a better resolution of 1440 x 3120px.
The Motorola Moto G Stylus features a superior camera than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Motorola Moto G Stylus also has a way larger aperture for better low light captures, a much bigger sensor and a lot more MP back camera.
The Motorola Moto G Stylus counts with a bigger storage for games and applications than LG G7 Fit, because although it has a slot for an external memory card that supports 1,45 TB smaller, it also counts with more internal memory. The Moto G Stylus has better battery duration than LG G7 Fit, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.