Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-04-16 | 2018-06-01 |
| 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Mystic indigo | Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | $ 170.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 397 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G7 ThinQ is just a bit better than the Moto G Stylus, getting an 81 score against 79.7. Even though LG G7 ThinQ is older than Moto G Stylus, it's construction is somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner. Both phones we are comparing come with Android OS (operating system), but the LG G7 ThinQ has 9.0 Pie version while Moto G Stylus has Android 11.
LG G7 ThinQ counts with a little faster processing unit than Moto G Stylus. Both of them have a Octa-Core CPU and a 4 GB RAM. The LG G7 ThinQ counts with a lot better looking display than Moto G Stylus, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better pixel density and a better resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels.
LG G7 ThinQ counts with slightly more storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. Moto G Stylus counts with a much better camera than LG G7 ThinQ, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rate and a tinier aperture which is worse for shooting photographs and video in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Moto G Stylus also counts with a lot larger sensor and a way more MP camera.
Motorola Moto G Stylus has superior battery performance than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
LG G7 ThinQ not only is the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones, which makes buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.