Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 84.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-04-16 | 2019-04-11 |
| 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.98 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Mystic indigo | Aurora black, Carmine red and Platinum gray |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | $ 215.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G8 ThinQ is slightly better than Moto G Stylus, with a global score of 84.3 against 79.7. These phones include Android operating system, but LG G8 ThinQ has a more recent 9.0 Pie version while Moto G Stylus has Android 11. LG G8 ThinQ's design is a bit thinner and somewhat lighter than the Moto G Stylus, despite of the fact that it was released around 12 months before.
The LG G8 ThinQ features a little bit better processing power than Motorola Moto G Stylus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG G8 ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM memory. LG G8 ThinQ has a better looking screen than Moto G Stylus, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better count of pixels per screen inch and a better 1440 x 3120 pixels resolution.
The Moto G Stylus counts with a superior camera than LG G8 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for shooting photos and video in low-light situations and worse video frame rate, and they both have the same video definition, the Moto G Stylus also counts with a lot larger back camera sensor which gives a way higher image and video quality and a much higher 48 MP resolution back facing camera.
LG G8 ThinQ counts with a much bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Moto G Stylus, and although they both have equal internal storage, the LG G8 ThinQ also has an external memory card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. Moto G Stylus has just a bit better battery lifetime than LG G8 ThinQ, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
LG G8 ThinQ not only is the best devices in our comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.