Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-04-16 | 2020-11-06 |
| 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Mystic indigo | Titan gray |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| $ 300.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 397 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG K92 is a little bit better than the Moto G Stylus, with a score of 85.4 against 79.7. These devices have Android operating system, but the LG K92 has older 10 version and Moto G Stylus has Android 11 version. Although LG K92 and Moto G Stylus were released only 7 months apart, LG K92's construction is just a little bit thinner but a little bit heavier than Moto G Stylus.
The LG K92 counts with a bit better CPU than Motorola Moto G Stylus, and although they both have 8 cores, the LG K92 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The LG K92 and Motorola Moto G Stylus feature extremely similar displays, because although the LG K92 has a little lower number of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a bit larger display.
LG K92 captures a bit better photos and videos than Moto G Stylus, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the same (4K) video quality and a same size back-facing camera sensor, the LG K92 also counts with a back-facing camera with a way better 64 MP resolution.
LG K92 has much more storage for apps and games than Motorola Moto G Stylus, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the LG K92 also has a SD card slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. The LG K92 features a battery duration that is just as good as the battery life in Moto G Stylus.
The LG K92 costs more than the Moto G Stylus, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.