Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-16 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Mystic indigo | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ has a global score of 81.3, which is a bit better than the Moto G Stylus's 79.7 score. LG V35 ThinQ is an older device than the Moto G Stylus, but it's somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter anyway. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with just a little better hardware performance than Moto G Stylus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM.
LG V35 ThinQ features a bit more vivid screen than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2880px and more pixels per inch in the display. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a slightly better memory to store more apps and games than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB.
Motorola Moto G Stylus takes much better photos and videos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Motorola Moto G Stylus also counts with a way better resolution camera in the back and a lot bigger sensor providing a lot better image quality.
Moto G Stylus counts with improved battery performance than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 21 percent more battery size.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the LG V35 ThinQ is also cheaper than the other phone, which makes this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.