Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-04-16 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Mystic indigo | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V40 ThinQ is slightly better than Moto G Stylus, having an 81.2 score against 79.7. These phones come with Android OS (operating system), but LG V40 ThinQ has older 10 version and Moto G Stylus has Android 11 version. Although the LG V40 ThinQ is older than Moto G Stylus, it's design is somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner.
The LG V40 ThinQ has a bit more powerful processor than Moto G Stylus, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG V40 ThinQ also has more RAM memory. LG V40 ThinQ features a little more vivid display than Moto G Stylus, and although they both have a display with the same size, the LG V40 ThinQ also has more pixels per inch in the display and a better 1440 x 3120 resolution.
The LG V40 ThinQ features just a bit bigger memory for games and applications than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Motorola Moto G Stylus counts with greater battery duration than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
The Motorola Moto G Stylus features a much better camera than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture and lower video frame rate, and they both have the same video definition, the Motorola Moto G Stylus also counts with a back facing camera with a way better 48 mega pixels resolution and a much bigger sensor.
The LG V40 ThinQ not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.