Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-16 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Mystic indigo | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet has a general score of 87.1, which is just a bit better than Moto G Stylus's overall score of 79.7. LG Velvet's body is thinner and a little bit lighter than Moto G Stylus, even though both of them were released only a couple of months apart. The LG Velvet features a bit faster processor than Moto G Stylus, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG Velvet also has a higher amount of RAM.
LG Velvet has a bit more vivid display than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because although it has a little bit lower screen density, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2460px and a bit larger screen. LG Velvet has a way bigger storage to install applications and games than Motorola Moto G Stylus, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the LG Velvet also has an external memory card slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
The Motorola Moto G Stylus has a bit better camera than LG Velvet, and although they both have the same resolution back camera, the same (4K) video resolution, the same video frame rate and a same size back-facing camera sensor, the Motorola Moto G Stylus also has a larger aperture for better photos in poorly lited environments.
The LG Velvet counts with just a little better battery performance than Moto G Stylus, because it has an 8 percent more battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, LG Velvet is also cheaper than the Moto G Stylus, making this phone an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.