Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 91.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-04-16 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 9.17 ounces |
| Mystic indigo | Aurora gray and Illusion Sky |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Wing is much better than Motorola Moto G Stylus, having a score of 91.2 against 79.7. Although LG Wing is a better cellphone than the Motorola Moto G Stylus, we must tell that it's also a somewhat thicker and extremely heavier cellphone. Both of these devices come with Android operating system, but the LG Wing has the older 10 version and Motorola Moto G Stylus has Android 11 version.
The LG Wing counts with a little bit better processing power than Motorola Moto G Stylus, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the LG Wing also has 4 GB more RAM. The LG Wing has just a bit better looking screen than Moto G Stylus, because although it has a little inferior quantity of pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a bit larger screen and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2460px.
LG Wing shoots a little bit better videos and photos than Moto G Stylus, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for low-light captures, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the LG Wing also counts with a larger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a way higher resolution back facing camera and higher video frame rate.
LG Wing counts with a much greater storage to store more games and applications than Moto G Stylus, because it has 256 GB internal memory and a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG Wing's battery lifetime is very similar to the battery duration in Motorola Moto G Stylus.
Although LG Wing is a better device, it is way more expensive than Moto G Stylus, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Moto G Stylus. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy the Moto G Stylus, letting go a few features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.