Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 13 |
| 2020-04-16 | 2023-09-14 |
| 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Mystic indigo | Black, Caneel Bay and Soothing Sea |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G610 MC3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Moto G Stylus has a score of 79.7, which is a little bit better than the Motorola Edge 40 Neo's 77 score. Even being the best in this comparison review, the Moto G Stylus is an a lot older, somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier cellphone than the Motorola Edge 40 Neo. Both phones in this comparison review work with Android OS, but the Moto G Stylus has an older 11 version and Motorola Edge 40 Neo has Android 13 version.
Motorola Edge 40 Neo has a brighter screen than Moto G Stylus, because it has a little better display pixels density, a bit bigger screen and a little higher 1080 x 2400 resolution. Moto G Stylus features a much better memory capacity for applications and games than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory, the Moto G Stylus also has a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
The Motorola Moto G Stylus features an extremely better processing unit than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, although it has lesser RAM, they both have 8 processing cores. The Motorola Edge 40 Neo counts with improved battery duration than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because it has a 25 percent greater battery size.
Motorola Edge 40 Neo shoots just a bit better photographs and videos than Moto G Stylus, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for capturing pictures or videos in low light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo also counts with a much bigger back camera sensor which gives a way better photo and video quality and a camera in the back with a better 50 mega-pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.