Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 13 |
| 2020-04-16 | 2023-04-04 |
| 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Mystic indigo | Interstellar Black |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 40 Pro is a bit better than Moto G Stylus, with a score of 83.4 against 79.7. Although Motorola Edge 40 Pro is just a bit heavier than the Moto G Stylus, it's a little thinner and also extremely newer. These phones include Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola Edge 40 Pro has 13 version while Moto G Stylus has Android 11, counting with a lot of extra features and a performance increase.
Moto G Stylus has a very superior hardware performance than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores. Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a bit sharper screen than Moto G Stylus, because although it has a little bit less pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a quite bigger screen.
The Moto G Stylus has slightly more memory to store more apps and games than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro captures much clearer photographs and videos than Moto G Stylus, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for taking pictures and videos in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a way better video quality, a more mega pixels back-facing camera and a lot bigger back camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a bit better battery performance than Moto G Stylus, because it has 4600mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.