Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-04-16 | 2024-08-29 |
| 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Mystic indigo | Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2760 x 1256 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 73.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4310mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a global score of 81.9, which is a bit better than the Moto G Stylus's overall score of 79.7. These phones work with Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a newer 14 version while Moto G Stylus has Android 11, so it gives you some extra features and performance enhancements. Motorola Edge 50 Neo's body is newer, lighter and somewhat thinner than Moto G Stylus.
The Motorola Moto G Stylus counts with a much faster CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has 4 GB lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a much better looking screen than Motorola Moto G Stylus, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also has a quite better 1256 x 2760px resolution and a just a little higher number of pixels in each inch of screen.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a bit better camera than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for taking pictures and/or video in low-light situations, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also counts with a lot larger back camera sensor providing a lot better image quality and a back-facing camera with a higher resolution.
The Moto G Stylus counts with just a bit bigger storage for games and applications than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 512 GB. Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a bit superior battery life than Moto G Stylus, because it has a 4310mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.