Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-04-16 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Mystic indigo | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is just a bit better than the Moto G Stylus, having an 87.1 score against 79.7. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra design is extremely newer and a bit thinner than Moto G Stylus's, although it is also just a little bit heavier. Both phones we compare here include Android OS, but the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a more recent 14 version and Moto G Stylus has Android 11, so it gives you some extra features and optimized performance.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a way better display than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because although it has a just a bit lower quantity of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a little bit bigger display and a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution. Motorola Moto G Stylus counts with a much better performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a bit better camera than Moto G Stylus, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a larger camera aperture, a better 50 MP resolution back camera, a much bigger back camera sensor taking much higher quality pictures and faster video frame rates.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a much better storage capacity to install applications and games than Moto G Stylus, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a bit longer battery life than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.