Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-04-16 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Mystic indigo | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| $ 300.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Moto G Stylus has an overall score of 79.7, which is just a bit better than the Motorola Moto Z Force's 75.8 global score. Moto G Stylus's construction is notably newer, but heavier and thicker than Motorola Moto Z Force. Both phones in our current comparison have Android OS, but the Moto G Stylus has 11 version and Motorola Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat.
The Moto G Stylus counts with a little bit better processing power than Moto Z Force, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the Moto G Stylus also has more cores. Moto Z Force has a bit sharper display than Moto G Stylus, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a greater pixel amount in each inch in the display.
The Motorola Moto G Stylus features a much better camera than Motorola Moto Z Force, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Motorola Moto G Stylus also has a bigger camera aperture to take better photography and videos in low-light environments and a back camera with a much better 48 megapixels resolution.
The Moto Z Force has just a bit bigger memory to install games and applications than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Motorola Moto G Stylus features just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has a 14% more battery capacity.
Moto G Stylus is more expensive than the Moto Z Force, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.