Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-16 | 2017-08-10 |
| 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Mystic indigo | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum |
| $ 300.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto G Stylus is a little bit better than the Moto Z2 Force Edition, having a overall score of 79.7 against 77.4. The Motorola Moto G Stylus body is extremely newer than Moto Z2 Force Edition's, although it's noticeably heavier and noticeably thicker. The Moto Z2 Force Edition features a little bit better performance than Motorola Moto G Stylus. They have the same RAM memory amount and 8 CPU cores.
Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a little more vivid screen than Moto G Stylus, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560px resolution and more pixels per display inch. The Motorola Moto G Stylus shoots much better videos and photos than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Motorola Moto G Stylus also has a bigger aperture for better low light photos and video, a way bigger back camera sensor and a camera in the back with way more MP.
The Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a slightly better storage capacity to store more games and applications than Moto G Stylus, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 1,95 TB. The Moto G Stylus features a way better battery performance than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 2730mAh.
The Motorola Moto G Stylus not only is the best devices of the ones in this comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.