Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 76.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-16 | 2018-06-29 |
| 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Mystic indigo | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Moto G Stylus is a bit better than the Moto Z3 Play, having a global score of 79.7 against 76.3. Although the Moto G Stylus is newer than Moto Z3 Play, it's notably thicker and somewhat heavier. The Motorola Moto G Stylus counts with a bit more powerful processor than Moto Z3 Play. They have the same RAM amount and a Octa-Core CPU.
Moto G Stylus and Motorola Moto Z3 Play both count with extremely similar screens, because although the Motorola Moto Z3 Play has a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2160 pixels and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit higher screen pixels density. The Moto G Stylus captures better photographs and videos than Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same video frame rate, the Moto G Stylus also has a lot bigger sensor which offers a lot better image and video quality and a camera in the back with a lot higher 48 megapixels resolution.
The Motorola Moto Z3 Play features just a bit more memory capacity for applications and games than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB. Moto G Stylus has greater battery life than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because it has a 33 percent larger battery capacity.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, Motorola Moto G Stylus is also by far the cheapest, which makes it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.