Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-04-16 | 2019-12-04 |
| 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Mystic indigo | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic |
| $ 300.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 397 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Hyper is a little bit better than Motorola Moto G Stylus, getting a general score of 79.8 against 79.7. These phones work with the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't notice any difference regarding OS features. Even though Motorola One Hyper and the Motorola Moto G Stylus were released with only 4 months difference, the Motorola One Hyper construction is a bit thinner but also just a little heavier than the Motorola Moto G Stylus.
The Motorola One Hyper and Moto G Stylus both count with similar screens, because although the Motorola One Hyper has a just a bit inferior pixel quantity per inch of display, it also counts with a little bigger display and a quite better 1080 x 2340px resolution. The Motorola One Hyper counts with a bit more storage capacity for games and applications than Moto G Stylus, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Motorola One Hyper also has a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 1000 GB.
Motorola One Hyper features a processor that's very similar to the Motorola Moto G Stylus one, both have a Octa-Core CPU and the same RAM memory amount. The Moto G Stylus features a bit better camera than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a lot less MP resolution back-facing camera and a worse video definition, it also counts with a bigger aperture to capture better photography and video in poorly lited situations.
Motorola One Hyper features a battery lifetime that's just as good as the Moto G Stylus one.
Although Motorola One Hyper is a better device, it is more expensive than the Motorola Moto G Stylus, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola Moto G Stylus. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the Motorola One Hyper, otherwise you can save some money and get the Motorola Moto G Stylus, giving up a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.