Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 80.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-04-16 | 2020-09-23 |
| 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 8.01 ounces |
| Mystic indigo | Polar night |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| $ 300.00 | $ 449.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 397 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Nokia 8.3 5G is slightly better than the Moto G Stylus, having a score of 80.5 against 79.7. The Nokia 8.3 5G construction is heavier but just a little bit thinner than Moto G Stylus, and they were released with only a couple months difference. These phones come with the same Android 11 OS. Nokia 8.3 5G has a display that's just as good as the screen in Motorola Moto G Stylus, because although the Nokia 8.3 5G has a bit lower pixels count in each display inch, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a little bit larger screen.
The Nokia 8.3 5G counts with a little bit better processing power than Moto G Stylus, and although they both have 8 cores, the Nokia 8.3 5G also has 4 GB more RAM memory. Motorola Moto G Stylus has a better camera than Nokia 8.3 5G, because although it has a lower video definition and a camera with a way lower resolution, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture to capture better photos in low light situations and a bigger sensor which gives a better photo and video quality.
Nokia 8.3 5G has as much memory capacity for games and applications as the Motorola Moto G Stylus, both have a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB and exactly the same 128 GB internal memory. The Nokia 8.3 5G features just a bit longer battery lifetime than Moto G Stylus, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Although Nokia 8.3 5G is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Moto G Stylus, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Moto G Stylus. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy the Moto G Stylus, giving up some specs and features, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.