Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-16 | 2019-03-03 |
| 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.10 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Mystic indigo | Blue |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | $ 699.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3320mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Moto G Stylus is slightly better than the Nokia 9 PureView, having a score of 79.7 against 76.4. The Moto G Stylus construction is newer, but thicker and somewhat heavier than the Nokia 9 PureView. Nokia 9 PureView counts with a little faster processing unit than Motorola Moto G Stylus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Nokia 9 PureView also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
Nokia 9 PureView features a slightly better screen than Moto G Stylus, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per display inch and a higher 1440 x 2880 resolution. Moto G Stylus counts with a much better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Nokia 9 PureView, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Moto G Stylus also has an external memory card slot that allows up to 512 GB.
The Motorola Moto G Stylus features a superior camera than Nokia 9 PureView, and although they both have the same video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Motorola Moto G Stylus also has a larger diafragm aperture, a back-facing camera with a much better 48 megapixels resolution and a way larger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Moto G Stylus features improved battery duration than Nokia 9 PureView, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 3320mAh.
In addition to being the best phone in this comparison, the Motorola Moto G Stylus is also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.