Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 80.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-04-16 | 2021-07-29 |
| 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| Mystic indigo | Granite Gre and Ultra Blue |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | $ 550.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 397 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4630mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Nokia XR20 is a bit better than the Moto G Stylus, with a general score of 80.8 against 79.7. These phones come with the same Android 11 OS (operating system). Even though Nokia XR20 is newer than the Moto G Stylus, it is somewhat thicker and incredibly heavier. Nokia XR20 counts with a little bit better screen than Moto G Stylus, because although it has a just a bit worse display pixels density, it also counts with a little larger screen and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400.
Nokia XR20 features just a little better performance than Motorola Moto G Stylus, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Nokia XR20 also has a larger amount of RAM. The Motorola Moto G Stylus takes clearer pictures and videos than Nokia XR20, and although they both have a 48 mega-pixels resolution camera, the Motorola Moto G Stylus also has a larger diafragm aperture, a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a larger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Nokia XR20's storage capacity to store more games and applications is very similar to Motorola Moto G Stylus's one, both have a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 512 GB and equal internal memory. Nokia XR20 counts with just a bit better battery performance than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because it has a 16 percent greater battery capacity.
Although Nokia XR20 is a better device, it is way more expensive than Motorola Moto G Stylus, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola Moto G Stylus. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can get Motorola Moto G Stylus, letting go a few features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.