Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-04-16 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Mystic indigo | Cyber shade |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto G Stylus has a global score of 79.7, which is a little bit better than nubia Red Magic 3S's global score of 75.8. These phones include Android OS, but Motorola Moto G Stylus has the older 11 version while nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie version. Even when Motorola Moto G Stylus and nubia Red Magic 3S were released only 6 months apart, Motorola Moto G Stylus is a bit thinner and lighter.
The nubia Red Magic 3S has a little faster CPU than Moto G Stylus, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has 8 GB more RAM. The nubia Red Magic 3S features a little bit better looking display than Moto G Stylus, because although it has a just a bit worse display pixel density, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a quite bigger screen.
The nubia Red Magic 3S shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than Motorola Moto G Stylus, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the same camera sensor size and a 48 mega pixels resolution camera in the back, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a way higher 7680x4320 video definition.
Motorola Moto G Stylus has a slightly bigger storage capacity for apps and games than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 512 GB. Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with superior battery duration than Moto G Stylus, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Moto G Stylus not only is the best phones in our comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to others, which makes it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.