Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Oppo |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-04-16 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Mystic indigo | Ocean |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4260mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The OPPO Find X2 Pro is a little bit better than the Motorola Moto G Stylus, with a score of 83.1 against 79.7. Although the OPPO Find X2 Pro and the Motorola Moto G Stylus were released only 1 months apart, the OPPO Find X2 Pro design is a little heavier but also a little bit thinner than the Motorola Moto G Stylus. Both of these phones have Android OS (Operating System), but OPPO Find X2 Pro has the previous 10 version and Motorola Moto G Stylus has Android 11 version.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with just a bit better processing power than Moto G Stylus, and although they both have 8 cores, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has more RAM. OPPO Find X2 Pro has a more vivid display than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because it has a better 1440 x 3168 resolution, more pixels per inch in the display and a bit bigger screen.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro features a superior memory to install applications and games than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. OPPO Find X2 Pro captures a bit better pictures and videos than Moto G Stylus, and although they both have the same resolution camera in the back, a F1.7 diafragm aperture and the same video definition, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has faster 60 frames per second video frame rate and a much larger sensor capturing much better quality photos.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a little longer battery life than Moto G Stylus, because it has a 4260mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.