Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-04-16 | 2020-06-29 |
| 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.61 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Mystic indigo | Black |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 300.00 | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 397 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 9.84 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Moto G Stylus is a little bit better than the Galaxy A21, with a global score of 79.7 against 76.1. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but the Moto G Stylus has newer 11 version and Galaxy A21 has Android 10. Moto G Stylus's design is somewhat thicker but a bit lighter than Galaxy A21, and both were only released 2 months apart.
The Samsung Galaxy A21 counts with a bit superior CPU than Moto G Stylus, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. The Moto G Stylus features a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A21, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a way better 1080 x 2300 resolution and a greater pixel count in each inch in the screen.
The Moto G Stylus counts with a much better memory capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A21, and although they both have a SD extension slot that holds up to 512 GB, the Moto G Stylus also has 96 GB more internal memory capacity. Motorola Moto G Stylus counts with a lot better camera than Galaxy A21, because it has a back camera with a way better 48 mega-pixels resolution, a larger camera aperture to capture better low-light photography and video, a much higher video resolution and a much bigger sensor providing a much higher image quality.
Galaxy A21 counts with a battery lifetime that is just as good as the Moto G Stylus one.
Although Motorola Moto G Stylus is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Galaxy A21, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Galaxy A21. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the Motorola Moto G Stylus, else you can save a couple dollars and get the Galaxy A21, resigning some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.