Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-04-16 | 2021-06-24 |
| 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Mystic indigo | Gray, Mint, Violet and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 397 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G has an overall score of 84.6, which is slightly better than the Moto G Stylus's overall score of 79.7. Both of these devices include the same Android 11 OS. Although the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G is a little bit heavier than the Moto G Stylus, it's a little bit thinner and also newer.
The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G has a bit superior processor than Moto G Stylus. Both have the same number of cores and 4 GB of RAM memory. Galaxy A22 5G has a bit more vivid display than Moto G Stylus, because it has a bit higher amount of pixels per screen inch, a little higher 1080 x 2400px resolution and a little bit larger display.
The Motorola Moto G Stylus takes better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, and although they both have a camera in the back with a 48 mega pixels, the Motorola Moto G Stylus also has a bigger diafragm aperture and a much better 3840x2160 video resolution. Moto G Stylus has a bit bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a SD card slot that allows up to 512 GB against 1 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory.
The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G has improved battery performance than Moto G Stylus, because it has a 25% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.