Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-04-16 | 2023-12-11 |
| 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Mystic indigo | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G is a little bit better than the Moto G Stylus, having a score of 79.9 against 79.7. The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G is a noticeably newer and a little thinner phone than Moto G Stylus, but it's just a little bit heavier. Both of these phones have Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has a newer 14 version and Moto G Stylus has Android 11 version.
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G counts with a bit more vivid screen than Moto G Stylus, because although it has a little bit lower number of pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a bit larger screen and a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2340. Motorola Moto G Stylus has a much better performing CPU than Galaxy A25 5G, although it has less RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores.
Galaxy A25 5G has a bit more storage capacity to install applications and games than Moto G Stylus, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory, the Galaxy A25 5G also has a SD extension slot that allows up to 1 TB. The Galaxy A25 5G features better battery performance than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Moto G Stylus captures just a bit better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has a worse 48 MP resolution camera in the back and a lower video quality, it also counts with a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor and a bigger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.