Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-04-16 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Mystic indigo | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| $ 300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 268 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A30s is slightly better than Moto G Stylus, getting a general score of 79.8 against 79.7. Although the Samsung Galaxy A30s and Moto G Stylus were only released with a couple months difference, the Samsung Galaxy A30s is somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter. Both phones in this comparison review use the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't notice any difference regarding that.
Moto G Stylus features a much better looking display than Galaxy A30s, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Moto G Stylus also has more pixels per inch of screen and a much higher 1080 x 2300 pixels resolution. Samsung Galaxy A30s has as much storage for games and applications as the Moto G Stylus, both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
Moto G Stylus counts with a bit superior CPU than Galaxy A30s. Both of them have a Octa-Core processing unit and 4 GB of RAM. Samsung Galaxy A30s and Motorola Moto G Stylus both count with extremely similar battery performance. The Moto G Stylus counts with a better camera than Samsung Galaxy A30s, and although they both have a F1.7 camera aperture, the Moto G Stylus also has a back camera with a lot higher 48 mega-pixels resolution and a way better video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.