Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-04-16 | 2020-04-27 |
| 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Mystic indigo | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic |
| $ 300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A31 has a general score of 81.3, which is a little bit better than the Motorola Moto G Stylus's general score of 79.7. These phones work with Android operating system, but the Galaxy A31 has the previous 10 version and Motorola Moto G Stylus has Android 11 version. The Galaxy A31 design is a bit lighter and a bit thinner than Motorola Moto G Stylus, although they were only released 0 months apart.
The Samsung Galaxy A31 has a CPU that's just as good as the Motorola Moto G Stylus one, both have 4 GB of RAM memory and a Octa-Core CPU. Galaxy A31 has a little more vivid screen than Moto G Stylus, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Galaxy A31 also has a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a quite higher pixels density.
Motorola Moto G Stylus counts with a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A31, and although they both have a same size sensor and the same resolution camera, the Motorola Moto G Stylus also has a bigger aperture to capture better captures and video in poorly lited situations and a much better video quality.
The Moto G Stylus counts with a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A31, and although they both have a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB, the Moto G Stylus also has 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Galaxy A31 counts with improved battery duration than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because it has a 25 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.