Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-04-16 | 2021-02-25 |
| 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | -- |
| Mystic indigo | Awesome Black, Awesome Blue and Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Mediatek Helio G80 MT6769T chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A32 LTE Only has a general score of 82, which is just a bit better than the Moto G Stylus's general score of 79.7. The Galaxy A32 LTE Only body is newer, noticeably lighter and a bit thinner than Moto G Stylus. Both of these phones include the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't see any differences regarding that.
The Galaxy A32 LTE Only's CPU is just as good as the processing unit in Moto G Stylus, both have a 4 GB RAM memory and 8 cores. The Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only counts with just a bit better screen than Motorola Moto G Stylus, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only also has a little bit greater pixel density and a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 resolution.
Motorola Moto G Stylus has a little bit better camera than Galaxy A32 LTE Only, because although it has a camera with much less MP resolution, it also counts with a way better 3840x2160 video definition, a way bigger back-facing camera sensor which offers a lot higher image and video quality and a larger diafragm aperture for better low-light photography and videos.
The Moto G Stylus counts with a slightly bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy A32 LTE Only, because although it has a SD memory slot that allows up to 512 GB against 1 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only features better battery life than Moto G Stylus, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.