Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-16 | 2017-01-13 |
| 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.75 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.61 ounces |
| Mystic indigo | Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-T830 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto G Stylus has a general score of 79.7, which is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017)'s 75.8 general score. Even though Motorola Moto G Stylus is notably newer than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), it's heavier and somewhat thicker. Moto G Stylus has a bit better processing unit than Galaxy A5 (2017), and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Moto G Stylus also has 1 GB more RAM.
The Galaxy A5 (2017) features just a bit better display than Moto G Stylus, because although it has a quite smaller display and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 1920, it also counts with a just a bit greater pixel number per inch of display. The Motorola Moto G Stylus has a much better memory to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
Motorola Moto G Stylus counts with better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh. The Motorola Moto G Stylus takes way better pictures and videos than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a way more mega-pixels camera in the back, a much better 3840x2160 video quality and a bigger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.