Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-16 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Mystic indigo | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50 is a little bit better than the Motorola Moto G Stylus, having an 83.8 score against 79.7. The Samsung Galaxy A50 is an older phone than the Motorola Moto G Stylus, but Samsung was able to build it thinner and lighter. The Samsung Galaxy A50 features just a bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G Stylus. Both of them have a Octa-Core CPU and the same RAM memory amount.
Samsung Galaxy A50 has a bit more vivid screen than Moto G Stylus, and although they both have a same size display, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a quite higher screen density. The Galaxy A50's memory capacity to install applications and games is very similar to Motorola Moto G Stylus's one, they have a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB and exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity.
Moto G Stylus shoots better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A50, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Moto G Stylus also has a much better (4K) video resolution, a way bigger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a back-facing camera with a much higher 48 mega-pixels resolution.
The Galaxy A50's battery life is very similar to Moto G Stylus's battery duration.
In addition to being the best phone in this comparison, Galaxy A50 is also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.