Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-04-16 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Mystic indigo | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50s has an overall score of 86.6, which is slightly better than Moto G Stylus's global score of 79.7. These devices use Android operating system, but Galaxy A50s has older 10 version while Moto G Stylus has Android 11. The Galaxy A50s is a somewhat lighter and thinner phone than Moto G Stylus, even when both were released only a few months apart.
The Samsung Galaxy A50s counts with a little more vivid screen than Motorola Moto G Stylus, and although they both have a same size display, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also has a just a bit higher pixel quantity per inch in the screen and a bit higher 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution. Galaxy A50s's storage to store more apps and games is very similar to Moto G Stylus's one, both of them have exactly the same internal memory and an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
Samsung Galaxy A50s counts with just a bit better processing power than Moto G Stylus, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy A50s features a battery lifetime that's just as good as the Moto G Stylus one. Galaxy A50s's camera is very similar to Moto G Stylus's camera, and although the Galaxy A50s has a smaller aperture, they both have a 0.5 inches sensor, the same 30 fps video frame rate, a same resolution back-facing camera and the same 3840x2160 video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.