Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-04-16 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Mystic indigo | Prism cube black |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 5G is better than the Motorola Moto G Stylus, having a 90.8 score against 79.7. These phones use the same Android 11 operating system. Even though the Galaxy A51 5G and the Motorola Moto G Stylus were released only 0 months apart, the Galaxy A51 5G is a little lighter and a bit thinner. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G counts with a bit superior CPU than Moto G Stylus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G also has more RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a bit sharper screen than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because it has a little larger display, a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a little bit higher quantity of pixels in each inch of screen. The Motorola Moto G Stylus and the Galaxy A51 5G count with really similar cameras, and although the Galaxy A51 5G has a smaller aperture which is not so good for low-light photography and video, they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the same back camera sensor size, the same resolution camera in the back and the same video frame rates.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a little bit more memory for apps and games than Moto G Stylus, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G also has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1000 GB. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G counts with just a little better battery performance than Moto G Stylus, because it has a 13% larger battery size.
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is a little more expensive than Moto G Stylus, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.