Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-16 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Mystic indigo | -- |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic |
| $ 300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 is better than Motorola Moto G Stylus, having a 90.7 score against 79.7. Galaxy A52 is a newer phone, and it is also just a little thinner and a little bit lighter than the Motorola Moto G Stylus. Galaxy A52 counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G Stylus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A52 also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Galaxy A52 has just a bit better display than Moto G Stylus, because it has a quite bigger display, a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a just a bit greater display density. Galaxy A52 counts with a little bit better storage for games and applications than Motorola Moto G Stylus, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Galaxy A52 also has a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1 TB.
The Galaxy A52 features just a little better battery performance than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh. Galaxy A52 has a slightly better camera than Moto G Stylus, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for shooting photos or video in low-light environments, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy A52 also counts with a bigger sensor taking higher quality photographs and a back camera with lot more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.